References

Bowers, J.S. (2020) Reconsidering the Evidence that Systematic Phonics is more Effective than Alternative Methods of Reading Instruction.  Educational Psychology Review, 32, 681-705.

Bowers, J.S. (2021). Yes children need to learn their GPCs but there really is little or no evidence that systematic or explicit phonics is effective: A response to Fletcher, Savage, and Sharon (2020). Educational Psychology Review. Published online on 13 March 2021.  doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09602-z

Bowers, J.S., & Bowers, P.N. (2018). Progress in reading instruction requires a better understanding of the English spelling system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 407-412. doi.org/10.1177/0963721418773749

Bowers, J.S. & Bowers, P.N. (2021). The science of reading provides little or no support for the widespread claim that systematic phonics should be part of initial reading instruction: A response to Buckingham.  doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f5qyu

Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the english language (2nd Edition). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2014). Closing a Virtuous Circle Reciprocal Influences Between Theory and Practice in Studies of Reading Intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(3), 300-306.

Venezky, R. L. (1967). English orthography: Its graphical structure and its relation to sound. . Reading Research Quarterly, 75-105.